On 11/26/2014 06:35 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 25-11-14 16:00:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Tue 25-11-14 16:13:16, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 24-11-14 11:09:40, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6
On Tue 25-11-14 16:00:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 25-11-14 16:13:16, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 24-11-14 11:09:40, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> > >> wrote:
On Tue 25-11-14 16:13:16, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 24-11-14 11:09:40, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel w
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 24-11-14 11:09:40, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> >> Hash: SHA1
>
On Mon 24-11-14 11:09:40, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 11/20/2014 09:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/20/2014 09:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>
>>> I'm thinking about limitation for reusing anon_vmas which migh
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Also from reading http://lwn.net/Articl
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/20/2014 09:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking about limitation for reusing anon_vmas which might
>> increase performance without breaking asymptotic estimation of
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/2014 09:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I'm thinking about limitation for reusing anon_vmas which might
> increase performance without breaking asymptotic estimation of
> count anon_vma in the worst case. For example this heuristic: all
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> Also from reading http://lwn.net/Articles/383162/ I understand that
>>> correctness
>>> also depends on the
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Also from reading http://lwn.net/Articles/383162/ I understand that
>> correctness
>> also depends on the hierarchy and I wonder if there's a danger of
>> reintroducing
>>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2014 12:02 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
wro
On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 11/19/2014 12:02 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrew Morton
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/19/2014 12:02 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrew Morton
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:41:57 -0500 Rik van Riel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2014 03:19 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:41:57 -0500 Rik van Riel
> wrote:
>
>> That way people can understand what the code does simply by
>> looking at the changelog - no need to go find old linux-kernel
>> mailing lis
On 11/19/2014 12:02 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrew Morton
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:41:57 -0500 Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>
> Because of the serial forking there does inde
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:41:57 -0500 Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>>> > Because of the serial forking there does indeed end up being an
>>> > infinite number of vmas. The initial
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:41:57 -0500 Rik van Riel wrote:
>
>> > Because of the serial forking there does indeed end up being an
>> > infinite number of vmas. The initial vma can never be deleted
>> > (even though the initial parent process h
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:41:57 -0500 Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Because of the serial forking there does indeed end up being an
> > infinite number of vmas. The initial vma can never be deleted
> > (even though the initial parent process has long since terminated)
> > because the initial vma is refer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2014 08:41 PM, Daniel Forrest wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:02:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:30:53 -0600 Daniel Forrest
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There have been a couple of inquiries about the status of this
>>> pa
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:02:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:30:53 -0600 Daniel Forrest
> wrote:
>
> > There have been a couple of inquiries about the status of this patch
> > over the last few months, so I am going to try pushing it out.
> >
> > Andrea Arcangeli has
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:30:53 -0600 Daniel Forrest
wrote:
> There have been a couple of inquiries about the status of this patch
> over the last few months, so I am going to try pushing it out.
>
> Andrea Arcangeli has commented:
>
> > Agreed. The only thing I don't like about this patch is the
There have been a couple of inquiries about the status of this patch
over the last few months, so I am going to try pushing it out.
Andrea Arcangeli has commented:
> Agreed. The only thing I don't like about this patch is the hardcoding
> of number 5: could we make it a variable to tweak with sys
23 matches
Mail list logo