Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:43:50 + Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Patch makes available to the user the following
>> task and process performance statistics:
>> * Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
>> * Voluntary Context Switches (task
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:43:50 + Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch makes available to the user the following
> task and process performance statistics:
> * Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
> * Voluntary Context Switches (task_struct->nvcsw)
>
Changes:
Names are renamed to task_context_switch_rates.
Patch makes available to the user the following
task and process performance statistics:
* Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
* Voluntary Context Switches (task_struct->nvcsw)
Statisti
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:49:46 +
> Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +void print_taskstats(struct taskstats *t)
>> +{
>> +printf("\n\nTask %15s%15s\n"
>> + " %15lu%15lu\n",
>> + "voluntary", "nonvoluntary",
>> + t->nvcsw
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:49:46 +
> Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Removed syscall counters from patch.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Patch makes available to the user the following
>> task and process performance statistics:
>> * Involuntary Context Switches (task_stru
Looking at the diffs below, I see context switch counters added. What is
actually being removed?
Jonathan
On Mon Jun 4 12:33:15 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Add Jonathan Lim to cc, who is working on CSA userland implementation
> to use the taskstats data that this patch is going to remov
Add Jonathan Lim to cc, who is working on CSA userland implementation
to use the taskstats data that this patch is going to remove.
Thanks,
- jay
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:49:46 +
> Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Removed syscall counters from patch.
>>
>>
On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:49:46 +
Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Removed syscall counters from patch.
>
>
>
>
> Patch makes available to the user the following
> task and process performance statistics:
> * Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
> * Volun
Removed syscall counters from patch.
Patch makes available to the user the following
task and process performance statistics:
* Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
* Voluntary Context Switches (task_struct->nvcsw)
Statistics information is ava
On Tue, 22 May 2007 17:19:52 +
Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for bothering you. I know you are very busy but could
> you please tell me what is situation of this patch?
I'd like to add the context-switch accounting to the taskstats payload.
As we'd then need to uprev the t
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 05:19:52PM +, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> diff --git a/include/asm-i386/thread_info.h b/include/asm-i386/thread_info.h
> index 4b187bb..bccfd6a 100644
> --- a/include/asm-i386/thread_info.h
> +++ b/include/asm-i386/thread_info.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct thread_info {
Hello Andrew,
Sorry for bothering you. I know you are very busy but could
you please tell me what is situation of this patch? You wrote
me you'll discuss it with someone about it and say can it be
accepted or not and in which form. As I understand the
situation all problems now are in syscal
Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/accounting/taskstats-struct.txt
> b/Documentation/accounting/taskstats-struct.txt
> index 661c797..606aef6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/accounting/taskstats-struct.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/accounting/taskstats-struct.txt
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ There a
Hello,
Thanks all for very useful comments.
Please review this version.
Best regards,
Maxim.
Patch makes available to the user the following
task and process performance statistics:
* Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
* Voluntary Context Switches (task_struct-
Andi Kleen wrote:
Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This data is useful for detecting hyperactivity
patterns between processes.
You need a lot better rationale to slow down these important
fast paths. Particularly the syscall path is very hot.
Is this something that is really
Maxim Uvarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> This data is useful for detecting hyperactivity
> patterns between processes.
You need a lot better rationale to slow down these important
fast paths. Particularly the syscall path is very hot.
Is this something that is really generally useful? The co
I'm sending here the latest version of this patch.
Seems it was not on lkml mail list.
Patch makes available to the user the following
task and process performance statistics:
* Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
* Voluntary Context Switches (task_struct->nvcsw)
Hello Andrew,
I've added taskstats interface to that. Patch is attached.
Please also see my answers bellow.
Andrew Morton wrote:
(re-added lklml)
Patch makes available to the user the following
thread performance statistics:
* Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
* Volu
(re-added lklml)
> Patch makes available to the user the following
> thread performance statistics:
>* Involuntary Context Switches (task_struct->nivcsw)
>* Voluntary Context Switches (task_struct->nvcsw)
I suppose they might be useful, but I'd be interested in hearing what
the uses of t
19 matches
Mail list logo
