On Friday, July 22, 2016 10:35:27 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Am 28.06.2015 um 12:21 schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> > From: Markus Elfring
> > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:14:43 +0200
> >
> > The functions dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq() and wakeup_source_unregister() test
> > whether their argument is NUL
Am 28.06.2015 um 12:21 schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:14:43 +0200
>
> The functions dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq() and wakeup_source_unregister() test
> whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
> Thus the test around the calls is not nee
On Sun 2015-06-28 12:21:53, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:14:43 +0200
>
> The functions dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq() and wakeup_source_unregister() test
> whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
> Thus the test around the calls is not
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:14:43 +0200
The functions dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq() and wakeup_source_unregister() test
whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software
4 matches
Mail list logo