Hi Prarit,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:02:22PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 03:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 05:49:29PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> Commit 63692df1 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs") didn't check
> >> that
> >> the numa node pr
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:07:33AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On 10/06/2015 03:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Hi Sasha,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 05:49:29PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >>> Commit 63692df1 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs") didn't check
> >>> that
> >>> the nu
On 10/06/2015 04:02 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 10/06/2015 03:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Hi Sasha,
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 05:49:29PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> Commit 63692df1 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs") didn't check
>>> that
>>> the numa node provided by us
On 10/06/2015 03:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 05:49:29PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Commit 63692df1 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs") didn't check that
>> the numa node provided by userspace is valid. Passing a node number too high
>> would atte
Hi Sasha,
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 05:49:29PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Commit 63692df1 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs") didn't check that
> the numa node provided by userspace is valid. Passing a node number too high
> would attempt to access invalid memory and trigger a kernel panic.
Commit 63692df1 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs") didn't check that
the numa node provided by userspace is valid. Passing a node number too high
would attempt to access invalid memory and trigger a kernel panic.
Fixes: 63692df1 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: S
6 matches
Mail list logo