On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, John Levon wrote:
> Looks like you're still on the broken bkcvs, which is missing this
> patch:
>
> http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> which AFAICS is the correct solution to the problem.
Hmm i was actually using BK and not BKCVS
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 09:47:42AM -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > Unfortunately bkcvs seems out of date so I can't even look at this
> > myself.
>
> Yes you are right, i checked bk and there was a lot of shuffling about due
> to the timer override. But it looks like we're depending on the tim
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
>
> > = drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c 1.7 vs edited =
> > --- 1.7/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c 2005-01-04 19:48:23 -07:00
> > +++ edited/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> = drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c 1.7 vs edited =
> --- 1.7/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c 2005-01-04 19:48:23 -07:00
> +++ edited/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_files.c 2005-01-28 11:36:25 -07:00
> @@ -63,7 +63,9 @@ s
Running opcontrol --reset on an em64t P4 yields the following (clearly
there must be a reason why it's disabled but i'll address that
seperately);
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
c0562cf4
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP DE
5 matches
Mail list logo
