Patch is attached. Thanks.
-Corey
Andi Kleen wrote:
But in this case it isnt. Instead of all this complexity
just remove the NMI reassert code from the NMI handler.
It is oudated and mostly useless on modern systems anyways.
"mostly useless" and "completely useless" are two different thin
> >But in this case it isnt. Instead of all this complexity
> >just remove the NMI reassert code from the NMI handler.
> >It is oudated and mostly useless on modern systems anyways.
> >
> >
> "mostly useless" and "completely useless" are two different things.
It's completely useless (double chec
Andi Kleen wrote:
Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This patch fixes a race between the CMOS clock setting and the NMI
code. The NMI code indiscriminatly sets index registers and values
in the same place the CMOS clock is set. If you are setting the
CMOS clock and an NMI occurs, Bad va
Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch fixes a race between the CMOS clock setting and the NMI
> code. The NMI code indiscriminatly sets index registers and values
> in the same place the CMOS clock is set. If you are setting the
> CMOS clock and an NMI occurs, Bad values could b
This patch fixes a race between the CMOS clock setting and the NMI
code. The NMI code indiscriminatly sets index registers and values
in the same place the CMOS clock is set. If you are setting the
CMOS clock and an NMI occurs, Bad values could be written to or
read from the CMOS RAM, or the NMI
5 matches
Mail list logo
