On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 06:32:27AM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Bad entrance with bad idea I m afraid :-) sorry for the noise.
We all start somewhere, no worries :)
--
Cheers,
Joey Pabalinas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bad entrance with bad idea I m afraid :-) sorry for the noise.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 07:36:19PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Sorry I m not used yet at all to LKML rules.
>
> So here a slight difference in assembly generated between the two
> versions (amd64) :
> `
> .loc 1 7 7
> leaq-12(%rbp), %rax
> movq%rax, -8(%rbp)
> -.loc 1
Sorry I m not used yet at all to LKML rules.
So here a slight difference in assembly generated between the two
versions (amd64) :
`
.loc 1 7 7
leaq-12(%rbp), %rax
movq%rax, -8(%rbp)
-.loc 1 11 2
+.loc 1 9 6
movq-8(%rbp), %rax
movl$4, %edx
movl
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:35:43PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Using the return value of memset for save/load sake.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier
> ---
> lib/string.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/string.c b/lib/string.c
> index 38e4ca08e757..
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 03:35:05PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] memzero_explicit, optimisation for size.
>
>
> Using the return value of memset for save/load sake.
It's mangled, you, perhaps, need to use
`git format-patch ...; git send-email ...`
for sake of correctness.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:35:43PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
>
Hmm... Can we see the difference in assembly generation?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Subject: [PATCH] memzero_explicit, optimisation for size.
Using the return value of memset for save/load sake.
Signed-off-by: David Carlier
---
lib/string.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/string.c b/lib/string.c
index 38e4ca08e757..92da04a0213b 10
0001-memzero_explicit-optimisation-for-size.patch
Description: Binary data
9 matches
Mail list logo
