> There is a problem in this patch, in that this change is incorrect:
>
> >
> > @@ -2847,7 +2847,8 @@ void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu)
> > */
> > if (kvm_vcpu_latch_init(vcpu)) {
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state ==
> KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
> > -
On 22/09/20 07:23, yadong...@intel.com wrote:
From: Yadong Qi
Background: We have a lightweight HV, it needs INIT-VMExit and
SIPI-VMExit to wake-up APs for guests since it do not monitor
the Local APIC. But currently virtual wait-for-SIPI(WFS) state
is not supported in nVMX, so when running on
tt...@google.com;
> j...@8bytes.org; t...@linutronix.de; mi...@redhat.com; b...@alien8.de;
> h...@zytor.com; liran.a...@oracle.com; nikita.leshche...@oracle.com; Gao,
> Chao ; Tian, Kevin ; Chen, Luhai
> ; Zhu, Bing ; Wang, Kai Z
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: emulate wait-for-SIPI
On 27/09/20 03:51, Qi, Yadong wrote:
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] KVM: x86: emulate wait-for-SIPI and SIPI-VMExit
>>
>>> Again, this looks good but it needs testcases.
>>
>> Yes, the unit test development is WIP.
>>
>
> Hi, Paolo
>
> I have sent out
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] KVM: x86: emulate wait-for-SIPI and SIPI-VMExit
>
> > Again, this looks good but it needs testcases.
>
> Yes, the unit test development is WIP.
>
Hi, Paolo
I have sent out the unit test patch.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11799305/
Could you h
> Again, this looks good but it needs testcases.
Yes, the unit test development is WIP.
Best Regard
Yadong
On 22/09/20 07:23, yadong...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Yadong Qi
>
> Background: We have a lightweight HV, it needs INIT-VMExit and
> SIPI-VMExit to wake-up APs for guests since it do not monitor
> the Local APIC. But currently virtual wait-for-SIPI(WFS) state
> is not supported in nVMX, so when r
From: Yadong Qi
Background: We have a lightweight HV, it needs INIT-VMExit and
SIPI-VMExit to wake-up APs for guests since it do not monitor
the Local APIC. But currently virtual wait-for-SIPI(WFS) state
is not supported in nVMX, so when running on top of KVM, the L1
HV cannot receive the INIT-VM
8 matches
Mail list logo