On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:25:24PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:42:35 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Many i2c users consider short transfers to be an error and would prefer
> > getting -EIO instead of a positive return value and having to convert
> > it to
Hi Dmitry,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:42:35 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Many i2c users consider short transfers to be an error and would prefer
> getting -EIO instead of a positive return value and having to convert
> it to error code by themselves. So let's add the following new helpers:
>
>
Many i2c users consider short transfers to be an error and would prefer
getting -EIO instead of a positive return value and having to convert
it to error code by themselves. So let's add the following new helpers:
i2c_master_send_exact()
i2c_master_recv_exact()
i2c_transfer
Many i2c users consider short transfers to be an error and would prefer
getting -EIO instead of a positive return value and having to convert
it to error code by themselves. So let's add the following new helpers:
i2c_master_send_exact()
i2c_master_recv_exact()
i2c_transfer
4 matches
Mail list logo