On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:
>
>> > > Works as described. Thank you!
>> > >
>> > > By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip,
>> > > and
>> > > it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:
> > > Works as described. Thank you!
> > >
> > > By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip,
> > > and
> > > it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
> >
> > Ellen, are you okay with me applying the patch wit
On 07/08/2015 02:15 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:
Works as described. Thank you!
By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip, and
it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
Ellen, are you okay with me applying the
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Ellen Wang wrote:
> Works as described. Thank you!
>
> By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2 chip, and
> it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
Ellen, are you okay with me applying the patch with
Tested-by: Ellen Wa
Works as described. Thank you!
By the way, I tested the code with and without your fix on my rev 2
chip, and it behaved the same way as you describe on your rev 1 chip.
On 06/20/2015 11:20 PM, Antonio Borneo wrote:
Current implementation of cp2112_raw_event() only accepts one data
report at
Current implementation of cp2112_raw_event() only accepts one data
report at a time. If last received data report is not fully handled
yet, a new incoming data report will overwrite it. In such case we
don't guaranteed to propagate the correct incoming data.
The trivial fix implemented here forces
6 matches
Mail list logo
