Re: [PATCH] Fix messed hunks in generic_setlease

2007-09-25 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > I have noticed, that one hunk was lost and one duplicated > during merging the fix-potential-oops-in-generic_setlease(-xxx) > patches. One of the fixes is already in the hot-fixes, but the > second one is still lost. > > The returned pointer was not the one allocated, bu

Re: [PATCH] Fix messed hunks in generic_setlease

2007-09-25 Thread Pavel Emelyanov
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:57:45 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have noticed, that one hunk was lost and one duplicated >> during merging the fix-potential-oops-in-generic_setlease(-xxx) >> patches. One of the fixes is already in the hot-fixes, but the

Re: [PATCH] Fix messed hunks in generic_setlease

2007-09-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:57:45 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have noticed, that one hunk was lost and one duplicated > during merging the fix-potential-oops-in-generic_setlease(-xxx) > patches. One of the fixes is already in the hot-fixes, but the > second one is still lost.

[PATCH] Fix messed hunks in generic_setlease

2007-09-25 Thread Pavel Emelyanov
I have noticed, that one hunk was lost and one duplicated during merging the fix-potential-oops-in-generic_setlease(-xxx) patches. One of the fixes is already in the hot-fixes, but the second one is still lost. The returned pointer was not the one allocated, but some temporary used to scan throu