On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have made a new patch according Sergei specification.
>
I'll be happy to apply this patch once someone explains to me why we
can't just remove that check for cred != NULL, however I'm not
applying a patch purely in order to s
Hi
I have made a new patch according Sergei specification.
But there remains Tronds question though.
Best regards
Rickard Strandqvist
2014-05-16 14:19 GMT+02:00 Sergei Shtylyov :
> Hello.
>
>
> On 16-05-2014 1:56, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>
>> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null poi
Hello.
On 16-05-2014 1:56, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
---
net/sunrpc/auth.c | 10 +++---
1 fil ändrad,
Hi
I do not know, I'm not an expert on this code.
But since there before was a if (cred) someone must have thought this
could happen.
Best regards
Rickard Strandqvist
2014-05-16 0:07 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust :
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
> wrote:
>> There is otherwi
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
wrote:
> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
>
> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
> ---
> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 10 +++---
> 1 f
There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
---
net/sunrpc/auth.c | 10 +++---
1 fil ändrad, 7 tillägg(+), 3 borttagningar(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
6 matches
Mail list logo