On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:23:32PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >> ===
> > >> --- linux-2.6.21-rc3.orig/scripts/kallsyms.c 2007-03-07
> > >> 05:41:20.0 +0100
> > >> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc3/scripts/kallsyms.c 2007-03-07 23:
TECTED]>,
>Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix building kernel under Solaris 11_snv
>
Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/368
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:16:35PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Mar 9 2007 20:00, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:01:57PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >>
> >> Since Solaris seems to be on the run, I did myself try compile it.
> >> However, unlike the original poster wh
On Mar 9 2007 20:00, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:01:57PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> Since Solaris seems to be on the run, I did myself try compile it.
>> However, unlike the original poster who said he did so on SunOS 4.8, I
>> did it on 5.11_snv39, yielding a bigger
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:01:57PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Mar 8 2007 22:25, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix building kernel under Solaris
>
> Since Solaris seems to be on the run, I did myself try compile it.
> However, unlike the original post
On Mar 8 2007 22:25, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix building kernel under Solaris
Since Solaris seems to be on the run, I did myself try compile it.
However, unlike the original poster who said he did so on SunOS 4.8, I
did it on 5.11_snv39, yielding a bigger changeset
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:43:46PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Mar 8 2007 08:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:45:11PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mar 7 2007 09:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> >> #include
> >> >> #include
> >> >> #include
> >
On Mar 8 2007 08:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:45:11PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7 2007 09:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> >> #include
>> >> #include
>> >> #include
>> >> +#ifndef __sun__
>> >> #include
>> >> #endif
>> >> +#endif
>> >
>> >So if
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:45:11PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Mar 7 2007 09:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> #include
> >> #include
> >> #include
> >> +#ifndef __sun__
> >> #include
> >> #endif
> >> +#endif
> >
> >So if solaris doesn't need it, why do we need it on Linux?
>
> F
On Mar 7 2007 09:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> #include
>> #include
>> #include
>> +#ifndef __sun__
>> #include
>> #endif
>> +#endif
>
>So if solaris doesn't need it, why do we need it on Linux?
For __s32 and __s16.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:09:40AM -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> @@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#ifndef __sun__
> #include
> #endif
> +#endif
So if solaris doesn't need it, why do we need it on Linux?
> +/*
> + * Solaris does not strsep
> + */
> +#ifndef __sun__
>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:09:40AM -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>
> Fix varous build breakages that occur when building on a Solaris system
> (SunOS 4.8 to be exact)
>
> - No asm/types.h
>
> - lpptest doesn't make sense on a Solaris host (this should really be
> cross-built..)
>
> - Need to de
SIGRETRACT
I have -rt merged into my tree so this won't apply cleanly to mainline.
~Deepak
On Mar 06 2007, at 10:09, Deepak Saxena was caught saying:
>
> Fix varous build breakages that occur when building on a Solaris system
> (SunOS 4.8 to be exact)
>
> - No asm/types.h
>
> - lpptest doesn
Fix varous build breakages that occur when building on a Solaris system
(SunOS 4.8 to be exact)
- No asm/types.h
- lpptest doesn't make sense on a Solaris host (this should really be
cross-built..)
- Need to define __s32 and __s16
- Need to define Elf32_Section and Elf64_Section
- Solaris d
14 matches
Mail list logo
