On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> This was clearly intended as a retry-10-times loop, but due to the
> absence of code incrementing the loop-counter it was practically a
> retry-forever loop.
>
> Rewritten it as a for-loop as well to make the loop-counter increment
> (as
From: Giel van Schijndel
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 19:04:55 +0100
> This was clearly intended as a retry-10-times loop, but due to the
> absence of code incrementing the loop-counter it was practically a
> retry-forever loop.
>
> Rewritten it as a for-loop as well to make the loop-counter increment
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 19:04:55 +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> This was clearly intended as a retry-10-times loop, but due to the
> absence of code incrementing the loop-counter it was practically a
> retry-forever loop.
>
> Rewritten it as a for-loop as well to make the loop-counter incremen
This was clearly intended as a retry-10-times loop, but due to the
absence of code incrementing the loop-counter it was practically a
retry-forever loop.
Rewritten it as a for-loop as well to make the loop-counter increment
(as well as its potential absence) easier to spot.
---
drivers/net/ethern
4 matches
Mail list logo
