Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-23 Thread Rob Landley
On 02/21/2013 03:31:09 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Rob Landley wrote: > (I always have the todo list of doom, but all I've been able to do since the > breakin is forward patches to -trivial, and sending big stuff through that > seems inappropriate somehow...) FWIW feel free

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-21 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Rob Landley wrote: > (I always have the todo list of doom, but all I've been able to do since the > breakin is forward patches to -trivial, and sending big stuff through that > seems inappropriate somehow...) FWIW feel free to send anything through trivial though ... as long

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-21 Thread Rob Landley
On 02/19/2013 08:53:14 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: On 13-02-18 10:57 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 02/18/13 01:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> >>> It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at >>> the top level Documentation directory. This fi

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 02/18/2013 09:57:36 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 02/18/13 01:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at >> the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top >> level 00-INDEX by adding new ent

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-19 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On 13-02-18 10:57 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 02/18/13 01:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> >>> It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at >>> the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top >>> level 00-INDEX by adding new ent

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/18/13 01:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at >> the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top >> level 00-INDEX by adding new entries and deleting a couple orphans. >> Some subd

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-18 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at > the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top > level 00-INDEX by adding new entries and deleting a couple orphans. > Some subdirs could probably still use a check/cleanup t

[PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-14 Thread Paul Gortmaker
It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top level 00-INDEX by adding new entries and deleting a couple orphans. Some subdirs could probably still use a check/cleanup too though. Acked-by: Rob Landley Cc: Jiri Kosina

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-02-06 Thread Rob Landley
On 01/29/2013 09:34:00 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top level 00-INDEX by adding new entries and deleting a couple orphans. Some subdirs could probably still use a check/cleanup to

[PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions

2013-01-29 Thread Paul Gortmaker
It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top level 00-INDEX by adding new entries and deleting a couple orphans. Some subdirs could probably still use a check/cleanup too though. Cc: Rob Landley Signed-off-by: Paul Gor