Heikki Orsila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm resubmitting this as I didn't get any replies, this time CCeing
> proper people, sorry..
>
> Kernel locking/synchronization primitives are better than volatile types
> from code readability point of view also.
I think that just dilutes the real po
I'm resubmitting this as I didn't get any replies, this time CCeing
proper people, sorry..
Kernel locking/synchronization primitives are better than volatile types
from code readability point of view also.
This patch is against 2.6.22-rc6.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Orsila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff
2 matches
Mail list logo