Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix typo and unclear legacy API section

2020-12-04 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:26 AM Alexandre Courbot wrote: > The "Interacting With the Legacy GPIO Subsystem" of the documentation > was unclear at best, and even included a sentence that seems to say the > opposite of what it should say about the lifetime of the return value of > the conversion f

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix typo and unclear legacy API section

2020-11-22 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:31 AM Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 6:25 PM Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > > > The "Interacting With the Legacy GPIO Subsystem" of the documentation > > was unclear at best, and even included a sentence that seems to say the > > opposite of what it

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix typo and unclear legacy API section

2020-11-22 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 6:25 PM Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > The "Interacting With the Legacy GPIO Subsystem" of the documentation > was unclear at best, and even included a sentence that seems to say the > opposite of what it should say about the lifetime of the return value of > the conversion f

[PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix typo and unclear legacy API section

2020-11-22 Thread Alexandre Courbot
The "Interacting With the Legacy GPIO Subsystem" of the documentation was unclear at best, and even included a sentence that seems to say the opposite of what it should say about the lifetime of the return value of the conversion functions. Try to clarify things a bit and hopefully make that secti