Re: [PATCH] Define smp_call_function_mask() on uniprocessor builds

2007-10-24 Thread Avi Kivity
Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:51:25 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rather than #ifdef users of smp_call_function_mask(), define it as an empty macro to avoid build errors. The function explicitly prohibits callers from specifying the current cpu, so nothing needs

Re: [PATCH] Define smp_call_function_mask() on uniprocessor builds

2007-10-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:51:25 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rather than #ifdef users of smp_call_function_mask(), define it as an > empty macro to avoid build errors. The function explicitly prohibits > callers from specifying the current cpu, so nothing needs to be done. > > This

[PATCH] Define smp_call_function_mask() on uniprocessor builds

2007-10-24 Thread Avi Kivity
Rather than #ifdef users of smp_call_function_mask(), define it as an empty macro to avoid build errors. The function explicitly prohibits callers from specifying the current cpu, so nothing needs to be done. This unbreaks uniprocessor KVM builds. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> d