On Čt 25-08-05 10:36:31, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:50 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > diff -puN arch/i386/power/cpu.c~mcheck_resume arch/i386/power/cpu.c
> > > > > --- linux-2.6.13-rc6/arch/i386/power/cpu.c~mcheck_resume
> > > > > 2005-08-23 09:32:13.05400
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:50 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > diff -puN arch/i386/power/cpu.c~mcheck_resume arch/i386/power/cpu.c
> > > > --- linux-2.6.13-rc6/arch/i386/power/cpu.c~mcheck_resume
> > > > 2005-08-23 09:32:13.054008584 +0800
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-root/arch/i38
Hi!
> > > The boot code already initialized MCE for APs, it isn't required to
> > > initialize again. The MCE entries are cpuhotplug friendly, so for
> > > suspend/resume.
> >
> > Ok so you're saying the only change needed is to remove
> > the on_each_cpu() in the resume method? Fine I can do tha
Hi!
> > > diff -puN arch/i386/power/cpu.c~mcheck_resume arch/i386/power/cpu.c
> > > --- linux-2.6.13-rc6/arch/i386/power/cpu.c~mcheck_resume 2005-08-23
> > > 09:32:13.054008584 +0800
> > > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-root/arch/i386/power/cpu.c 2005-08-23
> > > 09:41:54.992540480 +0800
> > > @@ -104,
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 06:26 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 August 2005 06:16, Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> > The boot code already initialized MCE for APs, it isn't required to
> > initialize again. The MCE entries are cpuhotplug friendly, so for
> > suspend/resume.
>
> Ok so you're saying t
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 06:16, Shaohua Li wrote:
> The boot code already initialized MCE for APs, it isn't required to
> initialize again. The MCE entries are cpuhotplug friendly, so for
> suspend/resume.
Ok so you're saying the only change needed is to remove
the on_each_cpu() in the resume
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 05:59 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> [adding discuss to cc]
>
> On Wednesday 24 August 2005 05:47, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 05:12 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 03:59, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 03:52 +0200, Andi
[adding discuss to cc]
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 05:47, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 05:12 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 03:59, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 03:52 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 05:12 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 August 2005 03:59, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 03:52 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > x86-64 has resume support. It uses 'on_each_cpu' in resume method,
> > > > which
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 03:59, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 03:52 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > x86-64 has resume support. It uses 'on_each_cpu' in resume method,
> > > which is known broken. We'd better fix it.
> >
> > What is broken wit
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 03:52 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > x86-64 has resume support. It uses 'on_each_cpu' in resume method, which
> > is known broken. We'd better fix it.
>
> What is broken with it?
It's a sysdev. The resume method is invoked with inter
Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> x86-64 has resume support. It uses 'on_each_cpu' in resume method, which
> is known broken. We'd better fix it.
What is broken with it?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 12:32 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > It's widely seen a MCE non-fatal error reported after resume. It seems
> > MCE resume is lacked under ia32. This patch tries to fix the gap.
>
> Well, you patch seems like missing piece of puzzle, but:
>
> a) we probably want to do it for
Hi!
> It's widely seen a MCE non-fatal error reported after resume. It seems
> MCE resume is lacked under ia32. This patch tries to fix the gap.
Well, you patch seems like missing piece of puzzle, but:
a) we probably want to do it for x86-64, too, and
b)
> diff -puN arch/i386/power/cpu.c~mche
Hi,
It's widely seen a MCE non-fatal error reported after resume. It seems
MCE resume is lacked under ia32. This patch tries to fix the gap.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.13-rc6-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/k7.c |2 +-
linux-2.6.13-rc6-root/arch/i386/ke
15 matches
Mail list logo