Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules

2013-07-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs? > > > I don't know. Why wouldn't it? > > It was the only reason I could think of why that'd have

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules

2013-07-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > > Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs? > I don't know. Why wouldn't it? It was the only reason I could think of why that'd have been done. > Other users of the same interfaces (mx1_cam

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules

2013-07-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > This is required so we can build the imx sound support > > when ALSA itself is a loadable module. > > Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs? > I don't know. Why wouldn't it? Other user

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules

2013-07-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This is required so we can build the imx sound support > when ALSA itself is a loadable module. Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules

2013-07-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
This is required so we can build the imx sound support when ALSA itself is a loadable module. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Cc: alsa-de...@alsa-project.org Cc: Mark Brown Cc: Fabio Estevam diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig index aa43854..805b83e 100644 --- a/sound/soc/f