* Tony Lindgren [140522 11:41]:
> * Arnd Bergmann [140520 13:10]:
> > On Tuesday 20 May 2014 09:05:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Arnd Bergmann [140519 04:27]:
> > > > On Saturday 17 May 2014 10:56:02 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For the case of ARM710T, I think the last remaining us
* Arnd Bergmann [140520 13:10]:
> On Tuesday 20 May 2014 09:05:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Arnd Bergmann [140519 04:27]:
> > > On Saturday 17 May 2014 10:56:02 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >
> > > For the case of ARM710T, I think the last remaining user that can be
> > > configured is mach-integ
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 09:05:13 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann [140519 04:27]:
> > On Saturday 17 May 2014 10:56:02 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > For the case of ARM710T, I think the last remaining user that can be
> > configured is mach-integrator, but I don't know if anybody even has t
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:48:19PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > old features. Let's say in 10 years time we remove everything ARMv4,
> > another 10 years ARMv5 and so on. We could make these milestones shorter
> > but it really depends on what people use, we should not force them out
> > o
* Arnd Bergmann [140519 04:27]:
> On Saturday 17 May 2014 10:56:02 Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> For the case of ARM710T, I think the last remaining user that can be
> configured is mach-integrator, but I don't know if anybody even has that
> CPU tile, or wants to keep using it. If Russell and Linus
> old features. Let's say in 10 years time we remove everything ARMv4,
> another 10 years ARMv5 and so on. We could make these milestones shorter
> but it really depends on what people use, we should not force them out
> of the kernel if still in use.
Why do you care ? Worry about it at the point
On Saturday 17 May 2014 10:56:02 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > The difference between what you're proposing and what happened to ARMv3
> > is that ARMv3 was broken for quite some time (we read from some of the
> > CP15 registers which are read-only in ARMv3) and no one ever raised a
> > problem with t
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:26:38AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:56:02AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > The difference between what you're proposing and what happened to ARMv3
> > > is that ARMv3 was broken for quite some time (we read from some of the
> >
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:56:02AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > The difference between what you're proposing and what happened to ARMv3
> > is that ARMv3 was broken for quite some time (we read from some of the
> > CP15 registers which are read-only in ARMv3) and no one ever raised a
> > probl
On 17 May 2014, at 10:46, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:23:37AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:55:46PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> There was a CPU called the ARM710, it was ARMv3 and it had no Thumb support.
>>>
>>> There
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:23:37AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:55:46PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > There was a CPU called the ARM710, it was ARMv3 and it had no Thumb support.
> >
> > There is also a CPU called the ARM710T, which is ARMv4 and has Thumb
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:55:46PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> There was a CPU called the ARM710, it was ARMv3 and it had no Thumb support.
>
> There is also a CPU called the ARM710T, which is ARMv4 and has Thumb support.
>
> These are two completely different CPUs, the former was re
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 13:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> There was a CPU called the ARM710, it was ARMv3 and it had no Thumb support.
>
> There is also a CPU called the ARM710T, which is ARMv4 and has Thumb support.
>
> These are two completely different CPUs, the former was removed a
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:29:58AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Support for ARM710 CPUs was removed in v3.5. But a few lines of ARM710
> specific assembler code were left in the tree. Remove these too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
> ---
> This minor cleanup was suggested by Arnd. This patch is mos
Support for ARM710 CPUs was removed in v3.5. But a few lines of ARM710
specific assembler code were left in the tree. Remove these too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
This minor cleanup was suggested by Arnd. This patch is mostly
guesswork, as I already told Arnd, since I have never touched ARM
as
15 matches
Mail list logo
