On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:14:48PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:58:54AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Nothing in this header file depends on .
> > Rather, should be included for -ENODEV.
>
> So how do we end up with a definition for u32?
>
> I think you
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:58:54AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Nothing in this header file depends on .
> Rather, should be included for -ENODEV.
So how do we end up with a definition for u32?
I think you need both these include files.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/deve
Nothing in this header file depends on .
Rather, should be included for -ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
KernelVersion: 4.9-rc1
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-uniphier.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-un
Nothing in this header file depends on .
Rather, should be included for -ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-uniphier.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-uniphier.h
b/arch/arm/incl
4 matches
Mail list logo