On Sad, 2005-02-19 at 05:20, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > It means that padto has improved a lot (or the underlying allocators).
> > It also still means the patch makes the code slower and introduces
> > changes that have no benefit into the kernel, so while its good to see
> > its not relevant its still
Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-01-10 at 02:41, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Using rdtscl over the area affected by the patch on the two variants for a
sample of 234 small packets, I see an average of 4141 for using the
existing stack scratch area, and 4162 for using skb_padto. That is a
difference of ab
2 matches
Mail list logo
