On Tuesday November 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This may be 2.2.18 material after all I wrote last night:
> > Making nfsd's d_splice() compensate for d_move's limitations is not
> > only a kludge, but also it harder to keep nfsd correct.
> > someday, nfsd may not be the only creator of thi
This may be 2.2.18 material after all I wrote last night:
> Making nfsd's d_splice() compensate for d_move's limitations is not
> only a kludge, but also it harder to keep nfsd correct.
> someday, nfsd may not be the only creator of this kind of dentry.
Sure enough, there is just such a bug
The d_move() function doesn't correctly handle dentries that have no
parents (i.e. 'x->d_parent==x'). This patch lets it do so.
Normally, the only parentless dentries are filesystem roots. However,
the NFS server creates (temporary) parentless dentries whenever dentry
pruning has deleted the de
3 matches
Mail list logo