Re: [PATCH] 2/5: LSM hooks rework

2005-02-14 Thread Kurt Garloff
Hi Andreas, On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:30:33PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 22:11, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > Rather than having every LSM hook twice, once for the case with > > CONFIG_SECURITY enabled and once for the disabled case, put > > everything in one inline funct

Re: [PATCH] 2/5: LSM hooks rework

2005-02-14 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 22:11, Kurt Garloff wrote: > From: Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Clean LSM stub file > References: 40217, 39439 > > Rather than having every LSM hook twice, once for the case with > CONFIG_SECURITY enabled and once for the disabled case, put > everything in one

[PATCH] 2/5: LSM hooks rework

2005-02-13 Thread Kurt Garloff
From: Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Clean LSM stub file References: 40217, 39439 Rather than having every LSM hook twice, once for the case with CONFIG_SECURITY enabled and once for the disabled case, put everything in one inline function. This reduces the chance of the two to go out o