Re: [PATCH] 0/5: LSM hooks rework

* Kurt Garloff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > this goes back to a discussion in August last year: > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0408.1/0623.html Thanks for follow up Kurt. I'm travelling at the moment so bear with me if my response time is slow. In short, I don't mind switching o

[PATCH] 0/5: LSM hooks rework

Hi, this goes back to a discussion in August last year: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0408.1/0623.html The following patchset addresses three issues of the security.h stub collection: * All the functions are implemented twice, once for CONFIG_SECURITY enabled and once for disabl