On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:03:09PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:36:19PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:22:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:41:18PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:47:2
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:36:19PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:22:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:41:18PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:55:1
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:22:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:41:18PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:55:17AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:22:0
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:41:18PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:55:17AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:22:09AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > > > [1] Actually, until 972fc54
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:55:17AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:22:09AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > > [1] Actually, until 972fc544b6034a in uq/master is merged there won't
> > > > > be
> > > > >
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:55:17AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:22:09AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > [1] Actually, until 972fc544b6034a in uq/master is merged there won't be
> > > > any warnings either.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
> > > > ---
>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:22:09AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > [1] Actually, until 972fc544b6034a in uq/master is merged there won't be
> > > any warnings either.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
> > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:03:22PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:16:51PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > This patch removes KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS and uses num_online_cpus() for
> > KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS instead, as ARM does. While the API doc simply says
> > KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS should
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:16:51PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> This patch removes KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS and uses num_online_cpus() for
> KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS instead, as ARM does. While the API doc simply says
> KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS should return the recommended maximum number of vcpus,
> it has been returni
This patch removes KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS and uses num_online_cpus() for
KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS instead, as ARM does. While the API doc simply says
KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS should return the recommended maximum number of vcpus,
it has been returning KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS, which was defined as the
maximum tested number
10 matches
Mail list logo