2015-02-23 21:27 GMT+02:00 Noralf Trønnes :
> Yes, it's best to leave this alone for now.
> I'm working on a proposal to provide better layering and minimal coupling
> to fbdev. This will hopefully lead to screen_base eventually being used
> only twice in the fbtft module and nowhere else.
Ok, sta
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
index 9cc7d25..9114239 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ construct_line_bitmap(struct fbtft_par *par, u8 *dest,
signed
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:06:44PM +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> 2015-02-21 20:58 GMT+02:00 Dan Carpenter :
> > Send two separate patches. You can't "fix" sparse warnings. You can
> > only "fix" bugs. The rest is add annotation, doing cleanups or possibly
> > silencing warnings.
>
> My first ema
2015-02-21 20:58 GMT+02:00 Dan Carpenter :
> Send two separate patches. You can't "fix" sparse warnings. You can
> only "fix" bugs. The rest is add annotation, doing cleanups or possibly
> silencing warnings.
My first email wasn't a patch supposed for accepting, but rather a
request for comment
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:34:09PM +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> See below how sparse output changed with these changes.
> In few words:
> - fixed printf specifiers for size_t;
> - trying to fix address space specifiers issues, not sure what's correct
> approach, ASKING FOR COMMENTS AND HELP;
Send
See below how sparse output changed with these changes.
In few words:
- fixed printf specifiers for size_t;
- trying to fix address space specifiers issues, not sure what's correct
approach, ASKING FOR COMMENTS AND HELP;
- didn't touch "was not declared. Should it be static?" yet.
-drivers/stagin
6 matches
Mail list logo
