On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:17 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> Rafael,
>
> I top post the general things and answer in only a few sentences embedded in
> context below:
>
> I very much honour your work and your neutral opinions and reasoning and
> I always have.
>
> This patch is a resend and while I
Rafael,
I top post the general things and answer in only a few sentences embedded in
context below:
I very much honour your work and your neutral opinions and reasoning and
I always have.
This patch is a resend and while I try to come up with alternative hacks,
there still is no solution, not
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:22 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> On Monday, March 18, 2019 12:40:46 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:15 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > And who's BIOS, really? I guess you mean the OEM? Note, however,
> > that the user and the OE
On Monday, March 18, 2019 12:40:46 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:15 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
...
> And who's BIOS, really? I guess you mean the OEM? Note, however,
> that the user and the OEM may not agree on that, but whatever.
I mean both!
The OEM.
And the
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:15 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> On Monday, March 18, 2019 11:26:10 AM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:36 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
>
> ...
>
> > > On my workstation the BIOS initializes perf bias to:
> > > cpupower in
On Monday, March 18, 2019 11:26:10 AM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:36 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
...
> > On my workstation the BIOS initializes perf bias to:
> > cpupower info
> > analyzing CPU 0:
> > perf-bias: 7
> >
> > I could grep through quit
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:36 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:08:03 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:42 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > This is a revert of mainline git commits:
> > > commit b51ef52df71cb28e9d90cd1d48b79bf1
Hi Rafael,
On Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:08:03 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:42 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > This is a revert of mainline git commits:
> > commit b51ef52df71cb28e9d90cd1d48b79bf19f0bab06
> > commit 17edf2d79f1ea6dfdb4c444801d928953b9f98d6
> > commi
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:42 PM Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> This is a revert of mainline git commits:
> commit b51ef52df71cb28e9d90cd1d48b79bf19f0bab06
> commit 17edf2d79f1ea6dfdb4c444801d928953b9f98d6
> commit abe48b108247e9b90b4c6739662a2e5c765ed114
I'm not quite convinced that reverting these
This is a revert of mainline git commits:
commit b51ef52df71cb28e9d90cd1d48b79bf19f0bab06
commit 17edf2d79f1ea6dfdb4c444801d928953b9f98d6
commit abe48b108247e9b90b4c6739662a2e5c765ed114
It is about this kernel message showing up on quite a lot servers:
[0.072652] ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'norm
10 matches
Mail list logo