* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > thanks Jason, i have applied your cleanups to x86.git.
>
> I don't recall having actually seen the kgdb patches recently. Have
> they had a suitable level of review?
it was posted three months ago to lkml (the upteenth time) and we picked
it up
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:28:36 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Jason Wessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch is against the x86-git which included the kgdb core.
> >
> > Per review request from the x86-git maintainers, the kgdb-core has had
> > the kgdb_handle_exce
* Jason Wessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch is against the x86-git which included the kgdb core.
>
> Per review request from the x86-git maintainers, the kgdb-core has had
> the kgdb_handle_exception() separated into individual functions. This
> patch does nothing other than re-org
This patch is against the x86-git which included the kgdb core.
Per review request from the x86-git maintainers, the kgdb-core has had
the kgdb_handle_exception() separated into individual functions. This
patch does nothing other than re-organize the code. There are no
functional kgdb changes.
4 matches
Mail list logo