Re: [PATCH] [16/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 406-dynamic-pageflags.patch

Hi. On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 17:46, Shaohua Li wrote: > we are using cpu hotplug for S3 & S4 SMP to avoid nasty deadlocks. Could > this be avoided in suspend2 SMP? I haven't had any problems with this code but yes, I do want to switch to using hotplug. It's only in -mm, not mainline? Regards, Nige

Re: [PATCH] [16/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 406-dynamic-pageflags.patch

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:13 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 17:46, Shaohua Li wrote: > > we are using cpu hotplug for S3 & S4 SMP to avoid nasty deadlocks. Could > > this be avoided in suspend2 SMP? > > I haven't had any problems with this code but yes, I do want to

Re: [PATCH] [16/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 406-dynamic-pageflags.patch

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 12:20 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > + > +/* > + * Save and restore processor state for secondary processors. > + * IRQs (and therefore preemption) are already disabled > + * when we enter here (IPI). > + */ > + > +static volatile int loop __nosavedata; > + > +void __smp_su

[PATCH] [16/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 406-dynamic-pageflags.patch

diff -ruNp 500-version-specific-i386.patch-old/arch/i386/power/Makefile 500-version-specific-i386.patch-new/arch/i386/power/Makefile --- 500-version-specific-i386.patch-old/arch/i386/power/Makefile 2004-11-03 21:52:57.0 +1100 +++ 500-version-specific-i386.patch-new/arch/i386/power/