On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:29:30AM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:04:07 -0800
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:03:32PM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 05:28:27 -0800
> > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 3
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:04:07 -0800
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:03:32PM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 05:28:27 -0800
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > > The loff_t type may b
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:03:32PM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 05:28:27 -0800
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > The loff_t type may be wider than phys_addr_t (e.g. on 32-bit systems).
> > > Consequently, the
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 05:28:27 -0800
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > The loff_t type may be wider than phys_addr_t (e.g. on 32-bit systems).
> > Consequently, the file offset may be truncated in the assignment.
> > Currently, /dev/mem wr
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> The loff_t type may be wider than phys_addr_t (e.g. on 32-bit systems).
> Consequently, the file offset may be truncated in the assignment.
> Currently, /dev/mem wraps around, which may cause applications to read
> or write incorrect r
The loff_t type may be wider than phys_addr_t (e.g. on 32-bit systems).
Consequently, the file offset may be truncated in the assignment.
Currently, /dev/mem wraps around, which may cause applications to read
or write incorrect regions of memory by accident.
Let's follow POSIX file semantics here
6 matches
Mail list logo