On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:52:01 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Changelog v4:
> 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> and used it just to convert the function address.
> 2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made it
> in
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:22:22PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:16:57PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:01:37PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > >
> > > Do I understand it correctly that we could not patch functions that
> > > pass arguments on the
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:20:22 +1100
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > There is one remaining issue which I think would be really nice to
> > have(TM), and that's Steven's Ack for the whole thing :)
>
> Yeah. He's been on CC the whole time, but he's probably getting a bit sick of
> it all, as we'r
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > This aligns with my usual workflow, so that'd be my preferred way of doing
> > things; i.e. you put all the ftrace changes into a separate topic branch,
> > and then
> >
> > - you pull that branch into powerpc#next
> > - I pull that branch into livep
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > > This aligns with my usual workflow, so that'd be my preferred way of doing
> > > things; i.e. you put all the ftrace changes into a separate topic branch,
> > > and then
> > >
> > > -
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 23:52 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > > This aligns with my usual workflow, so that'd be my preferred way of doing
> > > things; i.e. you put all the ftrace changes into a separate topic branch,
> > > and then
> > >
> > > - you pul
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 09:56 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > Obviously it depends heavily on the content of my series, which will go into
> > powerpc#next, so it would make sense if this went there too.
> >
> > I don't see any changes in linux-next for l
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 10:31 +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 17:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > > 3. Added an error message when including
> > >powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h without HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> >
> > I don
On 04/03/16 23:42, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:52:01PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
>> index ec7f8aada697..2d5333c228f1 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
>> @@ -1265,6 +1271,31 @@ ftrace_call:
>> ld r0, LRSAV
Hi Petr,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:52:01PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Changelog v4:
> 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> and used it just to convert the function address.
> 2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made i
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:16:57PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:01:37PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > Do I understand it correctly that we could not patch functions that
> > pass arguments on the stack with this implementation? If yes, how hard
> > would be to get it
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:01:37PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> Do I understand it correctly that we could not patch functions that
> pass arguments on the stack with this implementation? If yes, how hard
> would be to get it working, please? At least, it would be great to
> catch this problem an
On Fri 2016-03-04 13:42:47, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:52:01PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
> > index ec7f8aada697..2d5333c228f1 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > @@ -1265,6 +1271,31 @@ ftrace_call:
> > ld
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:52:01PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
[...]
> index ec7f8aada697..2d5333c228f1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -1265,6 +1271,31 @@ ftrace_call:
> ld r0, LRSAVE(r1)
> mtlrr0
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIV
Hi,
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 17:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > From: Balbir Singh
> >
> > Changelog v4:
> > 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> >and used it just to convert the function address.
> >
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Obviously it depends heavily on the content of my series, which will go into
> powerpc#next, so it would make sense if this went there too.
>
> I don't see any changes in linux-next for livepatch, so merging it via powerpc
> would probably work fine a
Hi livepatch maintainers,
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 17:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Changelog v4:
> 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> and used it just to convert the function address.
> 2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390
Hi Petr,
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 17:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Changelog v4:
> 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> and used it just to convert the function address.
> 2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made it
>
* Petr Mladek [2016-03-03 17:52:01]:
> From: Balbir Singh
>
> Changelog v4:
> 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> and used it just to convert the function address.
> 2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made it
> inline, no error me
From: Balbir Singh
Changelog v4:
1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
and used it just to convert the function address.
2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made it
inline, no error message, return -ENOSYS
3. Added an err
20 matches
Mail list logo
