Re: [PATCH][RFC] Extend "memparse" to allow a NULL return pointer value.

2007-10-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > * Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:27:07 -0400 (EDT) > > > Extend the memparse() routine to allow a caller to use NULL as the > > second parameter value if he has no interest in that returned value. > > (not `he', but `it', even if `he', then better `callers' + `they')

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Extend "memparse" to allow a NULL return pointer value.

2007-09-23 Thread Oleg Verych
* Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:27:07 -0400 (EDT) > Extend the memparse() routine to allow a caller to use NULL as the > second parameter value if he has no interest in that returned value. (not `he', but `it', even if `he', then better `callers' + `they') > --- > > there appear to be quite a number of

[PATCH][RFC] Extend "memparse" to allow a NULL return pointer value.

2007-09-15 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Extend the memparse() routine to allow a caller to use NULL as the second parameter value if he has no interest in that returned value. --- there appear to be quite a number of calls to "memparse" which have no use for the value returned in the second parameter (the current pointer after the s