Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH][DOCUMENTATION] The namespaces compatibility list doc

2007-11-21 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Daniel Lezcano wrote: Pavel Emelyanov wrote: +2. Intentionnaly, two equal user ids in different user namespaces Intentionaly Intentionally - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at htt

Re: [PATCH][DOCUMENTATION] The namespaces compatibility list doc

2007-11-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:52:34 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > +1. Both the IPC and the PID namespaces provide IDs to address > > + object inside the kernel. E.g. semaphore with ipcid or > > + process group with pid. > > + > > + In both cases, tasks shouldn't try exposing this id to some > > +

Re: [PATCH][DOCUMENTATION] The namespaces compatibility list doc

2007-11-16 Thread Pavel Emelyanov
Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> >From time to time people begin discussions about how the >> namespaces are working/going-to-work together. >> >> Ted T'so proposed to create some document that describes what >> problems user may have when he/she creates some new namespace, >> but

Re: [PATCH][DOCUMENTATION] The namespaces compatibility list doc

2007-11-16 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Pavel Emelyanov wrote: From time to time people begin discussions about how the namespaces are working/going-to-work together. Ted T'so proposed to create some document that describes what problems user may have when he/she creates some new namespace, but keeps others shared. I liked this idea,

[PATCH][DOCUMENTATION] The namespaces compatibility list doc

2007-11-16 Thread Pavel Emelyanov
>From time to time people begin discussions about how the namespaces are working/going-to-work together. Ted T'so proposed to create some document that describes what problems user may have when he/she creates some new namespace, but keeps others shared. I liked this idea, so here's the initial v