On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, David Howells wrote:
> | Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ppc64/rwsem.h
> This uses the function wrong name. And:
I really shouldn't make patches like this in the morning on weekends,
when I'm still sleepy. Well, here is the trivial fix...
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAI
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, David Howells wrote:
> The comment attached to the drop-in replacement patch is wrong:
Indeed it is. Good thing Andrew doesn't seem to have dropped
it in ;)
> | +static inline int sem_is_read_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> | +{
> | + return (sem->count != 0);
> | +}
>
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is an incremental fix to the add-sem_is_read-write_locked
> patch in -mm. Also attached is a full version of that file,
> which can just be dropped into place - I've verified that none
> of the patches in your stack get rejects.
The comment attached
Hi Andrew,
Here is an incremental fix to the add-sem_is_read-write_locked
patch in -mm. Also attached is a full version of that file,
which can just be dropped into place - I've verified that none
of the patches in your stack get rejects.
The reason for this change is that a lock that's held for
4 matches
Mail list logo
