Re: [PATCH]: tick-sched.c build fix

2007-02-26 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:22:39 -0800 (PST) > With this, nobody will get bit by problems again. We should > provide something similar, if not identical, for clocksources > too. Perhaps we could even start trying at initial shift values > larger than 32. >

Re: [PATCH]: tick-sched.c build fix

2007-02-26 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:04:41 +0100 > On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 21:42 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > While getting dynticks/hrtimers up on sparc64 I ran into > > the following build problem. If you use get_irq_regs() you > > need to include asm/irq_regs.h >

Re: [PATCH]: tick-sched.c build fix

2007-02-25 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 21:42 -0800, David Miller wrote: > While getting dynticks/hrtimers up on sparc64 I ran into > the following build problem. If you use get_irq_regs() you > need to include asm/irq_regs.h > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL

[PATCH]: tick-sched.c build fix

2007-02-24 Thread David Miller
While getting dynticks/hrtimers up on sparc64 I ran into the following build problem. If you use get_irq_regs() you need to include asm/irq_regs.h Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index 512a4a9..51556b9 100644 --