On Friday, January 04, 2013 08:49:03 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The actual deletion is mind-numbingly simple; and if you go by the
> comments in the code, it is well overdue. However, in discussions
> with Frederic, he suggested to me that those comments might have
> been overly optimistic, and th
On Sunday, January 06, 2013 05:13:56 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 23:10 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, January 04, 2013 08:49:03 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > The actual deletion is mind-numbingly simple; and if you go by the
> > > comments in the code, it is we
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 23:10 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 04, 2013 08:49:03 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The actual deletion is mind-numbingly simple; and if you go by the
> > comments in the code, it is well overdue. However, in discussions
> > with Frederic, he suggested t
[Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/1] Delete legacy power trace API] On 05/01/2013 (Sat 23:10)
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 04, 2013 08:49:03 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The actual deletion is mind-numbingly simple; and if you go by the
> > comments in the code, it is well overdu
On Friday, January 04, 2013 08:49:03 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The actual deletion is mind-numbingly simple; and if you go by the
> comments in the code, it is well overdue. However, in discussions
> with Frederic, he suggested to me that those comments might have
> been overly optimistic, and th
The actual deletion is mind-numbingly simple; and if you go by the
comments in the code, it is well overdue. However, in discussions
with Frederic, he suggested to me that those comments might have
been overly optimistic, and that there may still be people out
there who are still unknowingly using
6 matches
Mail list logo
