On Tue, Oct 22 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:51:06PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > Thanks, I'll take a look at this. The plugging was done mostly hack
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:51:06PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Thanks, I'll take a look at this. The plugging was done mostly hacky
> > > when implementing it, it was meant to be revis
On Mon, Oct 21 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Thanks, I'll take a look at this. The plugging was done mostly hacky
> > when implementing it, it was meant to be revisited. So definitely room
> > for improvement there.
>
> Did you man
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Thanks, I'll take a look at this. The plugging was done mostly hacky
> when implementing it, it was meant to be revisited. So definitely room
> for improvement there.
Did you manage to take a look?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
On Sun, Oct 06 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> blk_flush_plug_list became a bit of a mess with the introduction of blk-mq,
> so I started looking into separating the blk-mq handling from it. Turns
> out that by doing this we can streamline the blk-mq submission path a lot.
>
> If we branch out t
blk_flush_plug_list became a bit of a mess with the introduction of blk-mq,
so I started looking into separating the blk-mq handling from it. Turns
out that by doing this we can streamline the blk-mq submission path a lot.
If we branch out to a blk-mq specific code path early we can do the list s
6 matches
Mail list logo
