On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:00:37PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:30:10 -0400
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > How does Joe Sysadmin tell if he has an affected legacy app or not?
> >
> > (The obvious "try it and see what breaks" is a non-starter for many places,
> > because y
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:12:22PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:30:10 -0400
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 EDT, Trond Myklebust said:
> >
> > > How about a boot/module parameter to turn it on or off?
> > >
> > > I don't see any point in having
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:30:10 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 EDT, Trond Myklebust said:
>
> > How about a boot/module parameter to turn it on or off?
> >
> > I don't see any point in having a sysctl for something like this: either
> > you have legacy applications or
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:30:10 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> How does Joe Sysadmin tell if he has an affected legacy app or not?
>
> (The obvious "try it and see what breaks" is a non-starter for many places,
> because you too easily end up in a loop of "enable it, find 4-5 show stoppers,
> tur
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:36:19 -0400
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:25 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
> > Print a warning or something so that they can be found. Don't go
> > breaking systems left and right. People have better things to do
> > than to fix the b
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 13:30 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 EDT, Trond Myklebust said:
>
> > How about a boot/module parameter to turn it on or off?
> >
> > I don't see any point in having a sysctl for something like this: either
> > you have legacy applications or
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:25 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Print a warning or something so that they can be found. Don't go
> breaking systems left and right. People have better things to do than
> to fix the build systems for ever program they use.
The kernel knows bugger all about what glibc fun
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 EDT, Trond Myklebust said:
> How about a boot/module parameter to turn it on or off?
>
> I don't see any point in having a sysctl for something like this: either
> you have legacy applications or you don't. It is not something that you
> switch off as you go off to lu
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:41:57 -0400
Peter Staubach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would agree. The 64 bit fileids will only become visible when
> the server is exporting file systems which contain fileids which
> are bigger than 32 bits and then only when the application
> encounters these file
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 12:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:16:03 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > That would be perfect. It can even be in non-legacy mode by default,
> > > > just as long as you can go back to the old behaviour when/if you
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:16:03 -0400
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That would be perfect. It can even be in non-legacy mode by default,
> > > just as long as you can go back to the old behaviour when/if you run
> > > into a non-LFS application.
> > >
> >
> > Wouldn't a mo
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 11:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:43:04 +0200
Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 -0400
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:52 +0200, Pierre Oss
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 11:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:43:04 +0200
> Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 -0400
> > Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:52 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:43:04 +0200
Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:52 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:41:16 -0400
> > > Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 -0400
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:52 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:41:16 -0400
> > Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We also have the 64-bit inode support from RedHat/Peter St
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:52 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:41:16 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > We also have the 64-bit inode support from RedHat/Peter Staubach.
> >
>
> As has been pointed[1] out[2], this will cause regressions for non-LFS
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
