On Wednesday January 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 29/01/07, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Finally getting that in will be so nice :-) Thank you.
>
> Btw: any reason why not to include the
> fl->fl_flags &= ~FL_SLEEP;
> bit as well? As in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/
On 29/01/07, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 16:08 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday August 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Could we instead replace it with a dprintk() that returns the value of
> > "res"? That will keep it useful for debugging purposes.
>
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 16:08 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday August 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Could we instead replace it with a dprintk() that returns the value of
> > "res"? That will keep it useful for debugging purposes.
>
> (only 5 months later...)
>
> Sure, how about this?
>
On Monday August 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Could we instead replace it with a dprintk() that returns the value of
> "res"? That will keep it useful for debugging purposes.
(only 5 months later...)
Sure, how about this?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Remove warning: VFS is out of sync with lock mana
Any chance we could get the patch below (or something similar) pushed
into 2.6.19?
On 21/11/06, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 21/08/06, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:34 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > Looking in fs/nfs/file.c (at 2.6.18-rc4-mm1 i
5 matches
Mail list logo
