Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench

2001-05-11 Thread David Collier-Brown
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote: > I am evaluating Linux 2.4 SMP scalability, using Netbench(r) as a > workload with Samba, and I wanted to get some feedback on results so > far. Also consider using Andrew Tridgell's dbench/tbench/smbtorture suit

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench

2001-05-10 Thread Maneesh Soni
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:30:35PM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote: > I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on > http://lse.sourcefo

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench

2001-05-10 Thread Dipankar Sarma
Hello Andrew, You would need contact one of the administrators of the LSE project for this. You would need a developer id for uploading. You can get all the information from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lse/. I think it will be very helpful to have the results including lockmeter and kernpro

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench

2001-05-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:30:35PM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote: > I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on > http://lse.sourcefo