On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:14:57AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Kim,
>
> Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Jaegeuk Kim writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> >> Hi, Jaegeuk,
> >> >>
> >
Hi, Kim,
Jaegeuk Kim writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> >> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>> >>
>> >> "Huang, Ying" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> He
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:50:02AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Hi, Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> "Huang, Ying" writes:
> >>
> >> > Jaegeuk Kim writes:
> >> >
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at
Jaegeuk Kim writes:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>>
>> "Huang, Ying" writes:
>>
>> > Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> >>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>> >>>
>> >>> > > >> > - [
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>
> "Huang, Ying" writes:
>
> > Jaegeuk Kim writes:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>>
> >>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-pe
Hi, Jaegeuk,
"Huang, Ying" writes:
> Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>>
>>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and set
Jaegeuk Kim writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The
>> > > >> > step
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The
> > > >> > steps for aim7 is,
> > > >> >
> > > >
Hi Jaegeuk,
>> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>> >
>> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The
>> > steps for aim7 is,
>> >
>> > cat > workfile <> > FILESIZE: 1M
>> > POOLSIZE: 10M
>> > 10 sync_disk_rw
>> > EOF
>> >
>> > (
>> > e
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:51:11AM -0700, huang ying wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Hi, Kim,
> >>
> >> "Huang, Ying" writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per
Hi, Jaegeuk,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Hi, Kim,
>>
>> "Huang, Ying" writes:
>> >>
>> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
>> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2%
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Kim,
>
> "Huang, Ying" writes:
> >>
> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >>
> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that
Hi, Kim,
"Huang, Ying" writes:
>>
>> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
>> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>>
>> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure
>> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct?
Jaegeuk Kim writes:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:44:20AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>>
>> > Hi Huang,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> >> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>> >>
>> >> "Huang, Ying" writes:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I checked the com
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:44:20AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Jaegeuk Kim writes:
>
> > Hi Huang,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Hi, Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> "Huang, Ying" writes:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I checked the comparison result below and found this
Hi Huang,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>
> "Huang, Ying" writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I checked the comparison result below and found this is a regression for
> > fsmark.files_per_sec, not fsmark.app_overhead.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Huang, Ying
> >
>
Hi, Jaegeuk,
"Huang, Ying" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I checked the comparison result below and found this is a regression for
> fsmark.files_per_sec, not fsmark.app_overhead.
>
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
> kernel test robot writes:
>
>> FYI, we noticed a -36.3% regression of fsmark.files_per_sec du
17 matches
Mail list logo
