On Fri 31-05-19 20:51:05, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 5/30/19 11:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 30-05-19 14:57:46, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > >
> > > As what we discussed about page demotion for PMEM at LSF/MM, the demotion
> > > should respect to the mempolicy and allowed me
On 5/30/19 11:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 30-05-19 14:57:46, Yang Shi wrote:
Hi folks,
As what we discussed about page demotion for PMEM at LSF/MM, the demotion
should respect to the mempolicy and allowed mems of the process which the
page (anonymous page only for now) belongs to.
cp
On Thu 30-05-19 14:57:46, Yang Shi wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> As what we discussed about page demotion for PMEM at LSF/MM, the demotion
> should respect to the mempolicy and allowed mems of the process which the
> page (anonymous page only for now) belongs to.
cpusets memory mask (aka mems_allowed
On 5/30/19 2:57 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
Hi folks,
As what we discussed about page demotion for PMEM at LSF/MM, the
demotion should respect to the mempolicy and allowed mems of the
process which the page (anonymous page only for now) belongs to.
The vma that the page is mapped to can be retr
Hi folks,
As what we discussed about page demotion for PMEM at LSF/MM, the
demotion should respect to the mempolicy and allowed mems of the process
which the page (anonymous page only for now) belongs to.
The vma that the page is mapped to can be retrieved from rmap walk
easily, but we nee
5 matches
Mail list logo