On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:48 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> It looks right to me now, so I've pulled it.
Interestingly, I'm not seeing pr-tracker-bot reacting to my pull.
I *think* that's because pr-tracker-bot saw the same thing as I
initially did for the pull request, so it thinks the pull I ac
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:39 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Now doing a fresh clone from git.k.org (not ssh) shows me the stale commit
> from last week.
Now it gets me the right thing too.
Note that I have some git magic that means that I always pull from the
ssh side of kernel.org, just to avoi
On Sun, 24 Mar 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 7:14 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Second more careful attempt for this set of fixes:
>
> What? No. It's the exact same garbage as last time, with no more care
> shown anywhere:
>
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c:346:2
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 7:14 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Second more careful attempt for this set of fixes:
What? No. It's the exact same garbage as last time, with no more care
shown anywhere:
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c:346:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘min’
sg_cpu->iowait_boo
Linus,
please pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
sched-urgent-for-linus
Second more careful attempt for this set of fixes:
- Prevent a 32bit math overflow in the cpufreq code
- Fix a buffer overflow when scannin
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 4:33 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > A small set of fixes for the scheduler:
>
> What? No.
>
> This is completely broken, and even warns loudly about it.
>
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c: In function ‘sugov_iowait_boos
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 4:33 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > A small set of fixes for the scheduler:
>
> What? No.
>
> This is completely broken, and even warns loudly about it.
>
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c: In function ‘sugov_iowait_boost’:
> ./inclu
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 4:33 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> A small set of fixes for the scheduler:
What? No.
This is completely broken, and even warns loudly about it.
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c: In function ‘sugov_iowait_boost’:
./include/linux/kernel.h:827:29: warning: comparison of
Linus,
please pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
sched-urgent-for-linus
A small set of fixes for the scheduler:
- Prevent a 32bit math overflow in the cpufreq code
- Fix a buffer overflow when scanning the cgrou
9 matches
Mail list logo