Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/19/2013 01:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 02/19/2013 10:19 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: My fault... I was

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 02/19/2013 10:19 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread.

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/19/2013 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread. The problem is that the fix is necessary but no

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:57:27PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > CC-ing Boris. Ah, the string after the "@" and before the ".com" is different now :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread. > > > > The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it > > introduces an undes

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 02/19/2013 09:47 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread. The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it introduces an undesirable host-guest dependency. In

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:38:31AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread. > > The problem is that the fix is necessary but not sufficient, as it > introduces an undesirable host-guest dependency. In order to allow > neerw guests to work on

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 02/19/2013 07:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: Those kill a kvm guest with a #GP. Can we apply the fix for it too pls? http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136077007423065&w=2 Linus, please skip this pull request, we'll sort it out. My fault... I was tracking the fix and lost track of the thread

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Linus, > > > > Please pull the latest x86-cpu-for-linus git tree from: > > > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git > > x86-cpu-for-linus > > > >HEAD: f0322bd341fd63261527b

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Linus, > > Please pull the latest x86-cpu-for-linus git tree from: > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-cpu-for-linus > >HEAD: f0322bd341fd63261527bf84afd3272bcc2e8dd3 x86, AMD: Enable WC+ memory

[GIT PULL] x86/cpu changes for v3.9

2013-02-19 Thread Ingo Molnar
Linus, Please pull the latest x86-cpu-for-linus git tree from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-cpu-for-linus HEAD: f0322bd341fd63261527bf84afd3272bcc2e8dd3 x86, AMD: Enable WC+ memory type on family 10 processors The biggest change is the enabling of the WC+