On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Unfortunately even with the latest bits from you the breakage I
> > reported weeks ago is not resolved:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:1
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Unfortunately even with the latest bits from you the breakage I
> reported weeks ago is not resolved:
>
> In file included from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:15:0,
> from kernel/bounds.c:14:
> include/linux/spinlock_
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:35:12PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Unfortunately even with the latest bits from you the breakage I
> > > reported weeks ago is not resolved:
> >
> > crap, its the qrwl
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Unfortunately even with the latest bits from you the breakage I
> > reported weeks ago is not resolved:
>
> crap, its the qrwlock bits, I fixed it for the config you gave me.
> Some paravirt crap header
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Unfortunately even with the latest bits from you the breakage I
> reported weeks ago is not resolved:
>
crap, its the qrwlock bits, I fixed it for the config you gave me. Some
paravirt crap header hell thing. Happen to have another .
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Not unexpected the breakage comes from:
>
> 5627b9d439cc4dfaab738b8c21eef10fb40733f8 is the first bad commit
> commit 5627b9d439cc4dfaab738b8c21eef10fb40733f8
> Author: Waiman Long
> Date: Mon Feb 3 13:18:57 2014 +0100
>
> x86, locking: Switch x86 to qrwlock-s
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:17:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Right now I'm somewhat 'missing' because I fell ill right when the
> > merge window began :-/ But I merged all your pending bits shortly
> > before the merge window started. During the merge window
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:17:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ingo is 'missing' most of the time, so while I sit here with a
> > massive queue of patches its nearly impossible for me to get
> > anything merged :-(
>
> Right now I'm somewhat 'missing' because I fell ill right when the
> merge
* Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your
> > > > tree without getting tons of
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your
> > > tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree
>
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your
> > tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree
> > based on your git tree I'll have to do some manual stuf
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 02:50:51PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 13:48 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Linus,
> > >
> > > Please pull the latest locking-core-for-linus git tree from:
> > >
> > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/gi
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 14:22 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your
> > tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree
> > based on your git tree I'
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your
> > tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree
> > based on your git tree I'll have to do
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your
> tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree
> based on your git tree I'll have to do some manual stuff but that is
> certainly possible.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:17:20AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > Ingo is 'missing' most of the time, so while I sit here with a massive
> > queue of patches its nearly impossible for me to get anything merged :-(
>
> Ugh. I'd love to
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Ingo is 'missing' most of the time, so while I sit here with a massive
> queue of patches its nearly impossible for me to get anything merged :-(
Ugh. I'd love to get this whole locking stuff sorted out. At worst,
could you just set up a g
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 02:50:51PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 13:48 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Linus,
> >
> > Please pull the latest locking-core-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
> > locking-core-for-linus
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:02:28 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 14:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:50:51 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >
> > > > The main changes in this cycle were:
> > > >
> > > > - reduced/streamlined smp_mb__*() interface that a
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 14:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:50:51 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> > > The main changes in this cycle were:
> > >
> > > - reduced/streamlined smp_mb__*() interface that allows more usecases
> > >and makes the existing ones less buggy, es
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:50:51 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > The main changes in this cycle were:
> >
> > - reduced/streamlined smp_mb__*() interface that allows more usecases
> >and makes the existing ones less buggy, especially in rarer
> >architectures
> >
> > - add rwsem implem
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 13:48 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the latest locking-core-for-linus git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
> locking-core-for-linus
>
># HEAD: 3cf2f34e1a3d4d5ff209d087925cf950e52f4805 rwsem: Add comments t
22 matches
Mail list logo
