Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-27 Thread Micah Morton
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:54 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:15 PM Micah Morton wrote: > > > > Ok so before the rebase ("reparent"), the commits were based on top of > > some commit that was months old at this point (can't quite remember > > now, I think one of the -rc's

Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-25 Thread pr-tracker-bot
The pull request you sent on Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:15:18 -0700: > https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git tags/safesetid-5.10 has been merged into torvalds/linux.git: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/81ecf91eab1045c009b5d73408c44033ba86bb4d Thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://kor

Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:15 PM Micah Morton wrote: > > Ok so before the rebase ("reparent"), the commits were based on top of > some commit that was months old at this point (can't quite remember > now, I think one of the -rc's for v5.8). Nobody cares if the old parent is old. In fact, that's u

Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-23 Thread Micah Morton
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:57 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:01 PM Micah Morton wrote: > > > > I just rebased to v5.9 to make sure the 1-line changes that touch > > kernel/capability.c, kernel/groups.c and kernel/sys.c still applied > > cleanly without conflicts. Should I

Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:01 PM Micah Morton wrote: > > I just rebased to v5.9 to make sure the 1-line changes that touch > kernel/capability.c, kernel/groups.c and kernel/sys.c still applied > cleanly without conflicts. Should I have rebased onto one of the -rc's > for v5.9 instead? No. You shou

Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-15 Thread Micah Morton
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:06 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > These were rebased since the merge window started, for no apparent reason. > > Were they in linux-next? Yeah, they are changes that were originally targeting the v5.9 merge window (and thus were in -next during July/August) but I didn't ge

Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
These were rebased since the merge window started, for no apparent reason. Were they in linux-next? And if so, why was I sent some different version? Linus

[GIT PULL] SafeSetID changes for v5.10

2020-10-15 Thread Micah Morton
The following changes since commit bbf5c979011a099af5dc76498918ed7df445635b: Linux 5.9 (2020-10-11 14:15:50 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: https://github.com/micah-morton/linux.git tags/safesetid-5.10 for you to fetch changes up to 03ca0ec138927b16fab0dad7b869f42eb2849c94: