On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:30:59PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > It still fails on arm64. The reason is that I had a __SYSCALL_COMPAT
> > guard to provide either the 32-bit syscalls or the 64-bit (generic) ones
> > via asm/unistd.h. With this change:
>
> Hmmm.
>
> W
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> It still fails on arm64. The reason is that I had a __SYSCALL_COMPAT
> guard to provide either the 32-bit syscalls or the 64-bit (generic) ones
> via asm/unistd.h. With this change:
Hmmm.
Why does asm/unistd.h get #included for the compat bits at all? Looking in
arch/a
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:15:13AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells (1):
> UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/arm64/include/asm
It still fails on arm64. The reason is that I had a __SYSCALL_COMPAT
guard to provide either the 32-bit syscalls or the 64-bit (generic) ones
via asm/uni
Can you merge the following branch into the arm64 tree please.
This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory
patches were pulled recently.
Now that the fixups and the asm-generic chunk have been merged, I've
regenerated the patches to get rid of those dependencies
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 08:51:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Can you merge the following branch into the arm64 tree please.
>
> This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory
> patches were pulled recently.
>
> Note that there are some fixup patches which are at
Can you merge the following branch into the arm64 tree please.
This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory
patches were pulled recently.
Note that there are some fixup patches which are at the base of the branch
aimed at you, plus all arches get the asm-generic b
6 matches
Mail list logo
