Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1

2001-03-20 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Neil Brown wrote: > On Friday March 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > | fs/nfsd/vfs.c | nfsd_link | > > | fs/nfsd/vfs.c | nfsd_symlink | > > These are not actually bugs. The usage of fh_lock is fairly obscure

Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1

2001-03-19 Thread Neil Brown
On Friday March 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here are some more results from the MC project. These are 16 errors found > in 2.4.1 related to inconsistent use of locks. As usual, if you can > verify any of these or show that they are false positives, please let us > know by CC'ing [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1

2001-03-17 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Andy Chou wrote: > Here are some more results from the MC project. These are 16 errors found > in 2.4.1 related to inconsistent use of locks. > +-++ > | file| fn

[CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1

2001-03-16 Thread Andy Chou
Here are some more results from the MC project. These are 16 errors found in 2.4.1 related to inconsistent use of locks. As usual, if you can verify any of these or show that they are false positives, please let us know by CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Andy Chou PS. I noticed that many of the loc